Israel, Palestine and me

For the past couple of months I’ve been reading and listening to comments and discussions, quite a few of them heated and angry, about Israel’s National Theatre company Habima, and how the Globe Theatre must revoke its invitation from Habima to perform the Merchant of Venice in Hebrew at its forthcoming Globe to Globe season. Today I responded to a friend’s face book status about his feature in The Daily Telegraph which discusses Israel forbidding Gunter Grass into the country. This is my response to my friend, and this is a feature in the Guardian about Habima and the Globe.

I disagree with boycotting any arts (or education) organisations, as they are the ones where dialogue is usually made and enemies stand a chance to come together. When I wrote my play Eating Ice Cream on Gaza Beach for the National Youth Theatre a few years ago, we had, at an after show panel, a Palestinian, and a Jew (me) sitting side by side in a theatre discussing Israel, Palestine and the mess we have. I was shouted at by two white, middle class, middle-aged men, because I didn’t take sides (the Palestinians’ side). As one of the actors said, it is not a writer’s job to take sides. As Chekhov said, it is the writer’s job to ask questions, not to give answers. The lovely Palestinian woman said she could never have imagined that she would be sitting next to a Jew in a theatre in London talking about this subject. Israel is wrong to turn away Gunter Grass, and Habima should be allowed to come here if invited. A theatre company is not a government, it is not the voice of the politicians. If it is, you might as well stop the RSC from touring anywhere abroad. I know there are many other Israeli theatres, like the Cameri Theatre of Tel-Aviv, who could have been invited, but they were not, along with many other theatre companies from different countries who could also have been asked. I was asked to sign the Guardian letter (along no doubt with countless others), I declined. I am a Jew who does not see Israel as my home, who does not agree with the right of return, a Jew who totally and utterly disagrees with the settlements and has always been in favour of a Palestinian State, in fact I am a little fed up of promoting my opinions so that people see me for the person I am, not the person they often think I am. Nick you and I have discussed this subject many times, but boycotting the arts is not where change will be made, if anything encouraging dialogue and plays that enter into those places we dare not enter into in our real lives, is perhaps a way forward. However, I do wish Habima was doing something other than the Merchant of Venice. I’m seeing a Maori language version of Troilus and Cressida and I can’t wait, although a hip hop version of Othello is equally appealing.

Fuelling my anger

Fuelling my anger

Yesterday evening, on the way back from half an hour in Brent Cross (I know, it has to be a record) with my mum, I decided to stop at a Tesco petrol station, but the queue was so long I couldn’t be bothered to wait. This morning, en route to the supermarket I went to our local petrol station. The tank was less than a quarter full and I usually wait until levels are this low before filling up. The sign outside said SORRY OUT OF PETROL. I didn’t bother trying anywhere else. If we run out, it will be because of government scaremongering and greedy people and panic. If we run out I will walk or take public transport or use a Boris bike if convenient. Greed has never been attractive. This always happens when some government minister scares us, and hey, guess what, it’s the Easter holidays, people will be driving all over the place, but it’s best to make them buy when they really don’t need to, it looks good after all. And hey, guess what, the tanker drivers are not really going to strike, not yet anyway. In all the years we have been warned of tanker workers going on strike, I have never, personally, known anyone run out of petrol for any reason other than stupidity. If people only filled up when they really needed to, there would be enough to go around, but because we live in a first come, first served society, where look after thyself comes well before look after those who really need looking after, there is an imbalance thanks to fear and greed. It’s a government ploy, bet fuel prices go up soon, bet the panic buying of fuel in the past days will have an effect on economic growth, which the Tories will no doubt bask in having achieved. Stop being greedy, buy when you need to, not because you can or because you are scared or too bloody lazy to walk or tube or bus it, think of others as well as yourself, think of those who really need it.

The next thing to worry about, as 5th April approaches (wonder if the date has been set to coincide with the new tax year for a reason?) is the hose pipe ban in some areas. I’ve seen the posters, warning us that we are IN DROUGHT. Ok, so maybe we can do without hose pipes and baths (I prefer showers, always have, I’ve never found it appealing to lie in my own dirty water) until the reservoir levels rise, but drought? Really? Oh come on. According to my online dictionary drought means ‘A long period of abnormally low rainfall, especially one that adversely affects growing or living conditions.’ I agree that we haven’t had much rain and the farmers may well be worried, but my living conditions are fine thank you very much. There’s still water from my tap, lots of water, I can shower anytime I want, I can flush the toilet and use a watering can as many times as I want and it looks like it might just rain, so who needs to use a watering can anyway? Can we stop making everyone panic and start making everyone just a little more sensible, perhaps even responsible? Fuel shortage, water shortage, what next? Hot pasty shortage?

Mr or Mrs or Miss? Actually I prefer Ms.

It’s that time of year when household policies come through the door as fast as junk mail, offering deals of all sorts. Usually they go straight in the recycling bag, unopened. But this one looked appealing, I’d glanced at it but didn’t do anything about it, because I had no time. It has sat on the edge of my desk for over a month, its white and orange lettering prompting me every day to READ ME. When I eventually read the details, it wasn’t bad, actually it was great, £200 cheaper than all the household policies we currently have added together, you know the kind – cover your inside and outside pipes, drains, mains water, boiler, plumbing AND this one offered electricity cover too. I’d missed the ‘take out this cover’ date by a day, but the lovely woman on the phone said not to worry, all would be well AND I could still have the free carbon monoxide detector. I was on a roll. We went through financing details, I gave her my name, I asked if two of us could be named on the policy and she said, ‘we can only put one name down, but your husband can call anytime.’ I said, actually I don’t have a husband, I have a wife. Pause. ‘Oh.’ Pause. ‘Sorry,’ she said. And we continued. I felt good, I’d been open and honest, as I always am, and I had hopefully made her think again, and not assume all women, if married, were married to men. The amount of times we have to spell it out, hello, I am married to a woman, I have a wife, NOT a husband, and if you insist on including a title, I prefer Ms. I’m definitely too independent to be called Mrs and too old to be called Miss (though on occasion when I am called Mademoiselle or Signorina, I blush and take great delight, though we all know it has been said to charm, and it works every time).

This morning I received the policy. Addressed to Mr Silas. I said to Stella, ‘when I told the woman I had a wife, do you think she thought I was a bloke with a high-pitched voice, rather than a woman with a wife?’ ‘Yeah,’ Stella said, ‘I do.’

I have crossed out Mr and put Ms on the policy. Do I call and set them straight, or ignore it?

Yours

Ms Shelley Silas married to Ms Stella Duffy

Freelance not free lunch

I seem to be angrier or more upset or just driven to blog this week than any other week. But this one has been a long time coming, and it was finally propelled onto the page because someone tweeted my wife Stella, saying she is privileged to do what she does. She’s out there, in the public eye, speaking on behalf of those who cannot speak out, or are not given the chance to speak out and the person said she should do more of this, spend more of her time speaking out, for them. But she’s a writer, and she has to write in order to be where she is, and try and make a difference.

ANYWAY

She really isn’t privileged. Neither am I. I can only speak for me, so for those of you who think me (and she) might be privileged, here’s a brief history of me!

Left my secondary modern with three o-levels. First job ever, age 17 at Her Majesty’s Theatre as a dresser. I was earning the grand sum of @ £34 a week, plus tips! I LOVED MY JOB. I got it by sheer determination, I made the phone calls, wrote the letters (yeah, we had to do it the old-fashioned way, and it took time and patience, the latter of which I have very little of these days, technology has made me impatient). I did that work for some time, went to drama school, worked during all my holidays as a dresser and later as a receptionist at the Pineapple Dance Studios, and as a motor cycle messenger, (albeit for one day), and in my local chemist and then I thought PR looked like fun, so managed to secure a job with a technical PR company (I know what ball valves and actuators are, do you?). Then I worked for Townsend Thoresen (I was there when the Zeebrugge ferry disaster happened), then I worked for a woman’s magazine (where I had some short stories published – and rejected), worked my way from secretary to assistant fiction editor, left (actually was forced to leave), returned a year later to be fiction editor of another title (YES!). Did this for ages, worked in casting, as a casting assistant, which I had actually done before (in a small office in Soho with Beth Charkham, while her sister Esta was casting something big).

Applied for an English degree at Birkbeck, did that for four years (all paid for by me!) while working full-time. On to an MA in Creative writing, applied and received an award for my fees and maintenance, though I was still working full-time. By now I was in my late 30s. I started writing, but worked full-time, and gradually gave up the full-time work to write. And I have been freelance for about 15 years.

The word freelance makes some people think you don’t actually have a job, while others think, ooh, you’re so lucky, you can do what you want when you want, you can choose to get up late and go away when you want, you can watch day time TV (I never have) you don’t have to shop with everyone else at the weekend, when the supermarkets are packed with tired people with proper jobs. You can welcome the washing machine, dishwasher (we’ve only had one for 3 1/2 years, we’re not that posh) central heating repairman whenever it suits you. Yes, granted we freelancers can do all of this, and we do. But we don’t get sick pay or holiday pay or compassionate leave, or a guaranteed wage or a pension (my total pension will I think last 6 months). And if we wait for the washing machine, dishwasher, central heating repairman to turn up when he says he will, and mostly they don’t, we still have to do the work, we still have to create and finish our work in order to hope to be paid. And can I just add that often the pay comes months later.

I work whenever I can. I had intended to work on a play when I returned from university today, but I had some family business to attend to and then decided to write this blog!

I like continuity, I like to wake up, have two cups of tea, some breakfast, check my mail, tweet and Facebook and then work. All of that is a warm up for me. I prefer to have everything clear before I write and I like peace and quiet. So when we had major building work next door (six months on one side and three on the other), it was at times impossible to think, let alone write. But we did. Because we had to.

For the past two years I have been in the fortunate position of having a guaranteed income, not a great amount, but it has made an enormous difference to my otherwise financially unstable working life. I have a job at a university two days a week, and I love it. At the end of May, this job stops, and then I’m back to my financially unstable working life. Right now, apart from this lovely job, I am waiting to hear about six projects all in some stage of development, a mix of theatre, radio and TV and all with no money yet. I am also working on a new play, written on spec – that means with no advance, commission, with no money yet. Many of us do this all the time. It’s just the way this profession is for some of us. Some of you may ask why, why would you work for no money? Because the possibility of making some proper money is always there, and things could change for me over night. And mostly, I love what I do. And I’d rather do the thing I love which has the possibility of making it big, than settle for less with no change to my working life or finances. I wouldn’t change it for anything.

And yes, there are writers who get huge advances and rolling commissions, but they still work hard and they had to start somewhere. So next time you have a paid day off to welcome the washing machine, dishwasher, central heating repairman, think of me, who is not getting paid to welcome any of these workers into my house, who does not have a technical department to sort out my computer as soon as I ask for help and not have to pay for it, who has to fit in other work around my actual work, teaching and talks and talking to new writers who want advice and events which we all have to go to, it’s just part of our job. And sometimes the events are glorious and sometimes they are dull, but it is part of what we do, and making an effort counts.

I know everyone thinks we have a glamorous life, (right now I am sitting in my claret dressing gown and pyjamas) and occasionally we do, we meet inspiring people and go to wonderful events. Most writers, book writers particularly, have to go to great lengths to promote their work, which include library talks, readings and interviews and sometimes TV and radio appearances, occasionally at very late notice, (sometimes for little money, sometimes for no money, hey it’s publicity, you want them to be paid as well?).

And then there are the meetings, ones which take up a whole morning or a whole afternoon or a whole day, which put an end to any real work, because when you return home you think about the meeting, and write up those great ideas you talked about, and answer 101 e-mails. Often those meetings could be taken on the phone or Skype, but the people with proper jobs like to go out and have a coffee or a glass of wine, it’s time away from their work, why wouldn’t they? Do you know how many meetings I’ve been to which have taken up so much time and amounted to nothing?

And then there’s the back ache from sitting, and not complaining (well, maybe a little) and booking expensive time with the osteopath to help your back ache so you can sit at your desk and work and get another back ache, and so it goes on. Do you know how many times people assume I can just sit down and write and keep writing, I can switch it on? I am not a light bulb. I have flashes of inspiration, but ideas have to be developed and worked on, and that takes times, and if you’ve stuck with this blog, you will see that writers often do not have time to do the thing that makes them money, the thing that will make them money. Those writers who are in the public eye, got there because of their work, and some of them do good in the world, but they have to keep working to keep their profile so they can keep making a difference. If they stopped working, the public would forget about them and that would be it! There are those who do take time to make change in the world, but we cannot do it 24/7. We have to work, it feeds us and it feeds you.

Talking of which, I might just get an hour of writing in before dinner and TV! Then again, I have just written over 1600 words. Mushroom soup tonight. Ah, privileged me.

Sad, angry and what happens next

I’ve just been sitting at my computer crying, watching scenes from the funerals of the three children and adult shot by a gunman in Toulouse.  No parent should have to bury their child, but for a wife to bury her husband and two children made me wonder if we have achieved anything in the ‘fight against terrorism’, when innocent people are still dying, when soliders are killed in a French street because someone  doesn’t approve of the country they are fighting in, but also because he wants to avenge the death of Palestinian children by killing Jewish ones.  As a Jew, I do not consider Israel my biblical home or any other home, London is my home, it’s where I have lived since the age of two, it’s where my heart and soul are, it’s where my past, present and future are.  That the wife of the man and two boys killed (along with a girl, all buried in Jerusalem), now wants to return to Israel, will only confirm the view that Israel is the only safe place for Jews, to live and be together, away from the harm of anti Semites and right wing trouble makers.  And you know what, today, I think this too.  And it makes me so sad and angry that we have achieved nothing but more hatred and more innocent deaths, and for what?  I’m sad that the gunman is a Muslim, I had hoped he was a white, right wing neo Nazi, because all this does is create more boundaries between Jew and Muslim, Muslim and the rest of the world, pitting one against the other.  It will reinforce what so many people already think, that Muslims hate Jews and Jews have a right to live in Israel, and we take a step backwards, perhaps two.  I have no intention of ever leaving London for another other country, but I stand up for the rights of everyone, for the Palestinians and Jews and soldiers who fight for people who believe war is a good thing.  Stand with me.  We need the world to be safer for all of us, no matter what colour, race, religion, sexuality or gender.  I am sad.

This is why…

This is why, in our privileged and educated society, it is our duty to make it okay for those who are not so fortunate, to make it safer for them to be who they are without compromising their identity. This is why anyone gay in power and in the public eye, in sports and where they are considered to be role models, must think of others, as so many already do and put themselves out there, on the line, every day.

Thinking of Plastic Surgery? Buy some Tupperware instead.

For the past week I’ve heard and read a great deal about the problems concerning breast implants, and each time my anger increases. In fact anything to do with plastic or cosmetic surgery for the sole purpose of enhancing your looks, fills me with rage. Why have it in the first place? Why have your body sliced open and filled with saline, silicone, and a variety of composite materials? Why have botox, collagen lip injections or many of the other treatments available, because you honestly believe what it says on the packet, that they will make you look younger or more attractive? I totally understand having plastic surgery for needs which include congenital defects and deformities, for people undergoing gender reassignment, or for reconstruction for post breast cancer mastectomies. But just to allow a surgeon to cut and pin back and remove and fill and enhance because you want to look better, isn’t a good enough reason, IMO. When I read about a young woman in Florida whose buttocks were injected with a mixture of cement and tyre inflater, I was horrified, and the pictures were jaw dropping. It’s even been suggested that her incisions were held together with superglue. I hope this is a one off case, but I felt sad for the woman, because I cannot imagine that her treatment is reversible, or that she was so desperate, she would go to any lengths to create the ‘perfect’ body. Yes, I would rather be a stone lighter, but I know how to achieve it – eat less and exercise more, that’s my new year’s resolution, again! I think this time I might just do it. But I would never consider surgery to make my body or face look different.

I have watched my wife deal with the aftermath of surgery after breast cancer, witnessed my late sister’s blemish free stomach become extremely scarred after two major operations for bowel cancer and a liver resection. I have seen countless members of my family and friends cope with the repercussions of surgery for various illnesses, and I believe that every single one of them would rather not have been sick, would rather not have been cut into. The choice they had was surgery and treatment, or remaining unscarred and unwell. And yes, they all had choices, but choosing to live with scars, as opposed to remaining whole and die, was not a choice most of them made.

Then there’s my brilliant mum. She’s eighty-three and looks exactly what a mum at her age is supposed to look like, and I love and respect her for it. She has shrunk in height, as we all do when we grow older, she has never coloured her hair (she asked my sister and I whether she should and we both said we loved her as she was, though my dad has always joked about turning her into a blonde). She is now losing a little hair, (I fully expect this to happen to me and many of my friends), and I know it bothers her, of course it does, no one says you have to like it, but she grows older with such grace and her natural beauty increases. She has lost sight in one eye, the other is on the decline, and there is nothing that can be done to save her sight. She is an ardent reader, losing her sight will mean not being able to continue with her great passion, and it is a passion, and this makes me sad. I am already pondering audio books, not the same experience, I know and her hearing is not great. We have become accustomed to raising our voices. Then again, she has just come round to wearing hearing aids, and they do help, although she wasn’t too keen on them at first. She isn’t used to handling fiddly objects or anything high tech, the closest she gets to e-mail is typing letters and then my dad sends them. He, at the age of eighty-four, is a genius on his PC. Mum used her electric typewriter up until she and my dad properly retired last year. Sometimes she is a little unsteady on her feet, but she walks as much as she can, occasionally with the help of a stick, or my dad, and she never complains. She says there are people younger than her with worse problems, and she just has to get on with it. My mum. She’s never worn tons of make up, she doesn’t need to, she is beautiful. She isn’t one for designer labels, or any labels, she isn’t a great shopper (sadly I didn’t inherit the latter trait!). She is warm and generous and kind and stands on her feet for hours baking. She tells me to make the most of everything while I can. Everyone loves my mum, because a mum is exactly what she is and what she resembles. I cannot imagine what she would have looked like if she had any amount of cosmetic or plastic surgery or treatment, I’m just glad that she didn’t (not that it was ever in her mind), because her beauty goes deeper than her skin, and that is something that cosmetic or plastic surgery can never alter. It cannot make you a nicer person, a more successful person, a healthier person. It cannot make you younger, it cannot halt the ageing process, and even though those who have had cosmetic surgery or their teeth whitened so extremely that they resemble a badly touched-up photo, do not look younger or, in many cases, any better, they just look different and mostly they look odd. When I see men and women of all ages with distorted faces (the Duchess of Alba is a good example), due to unsuccessful (or too much) surgery, I feel sorry for them, because for some reason they thought they could do better, look better, look younger. I shudder every time I see botched surgery, irreversible botched surgery, surgery which people think makes them looks great, but which the rest of us know makes them look like extras in a horror film. We all talk about it, the lip jobs that have gone horrendously wrong and ended careers, the eye tucks which make people look strange, the face lifts which have rendered skin unable to take its natural course, to the point of no movement at all. I wonder if that’s why the current trend in all things nostalgic on television (Mad Men, Boardwalk Empire and any amount of classical adaptations) is so high, because the characters (mostly) look like us, not cosmetically enhanced versions of us.

I love my mum’s wrinkles, not that she has many. My grandmother and then my mother always taught us to wash our faces with water, no soap, and to dry our skin by moving the towel upwards in one direction only, to keep the skin firm. My grandmother had the most amazing skin, and so does my mother. My sister had wonderful skin, mine is not bad, but then I used to sunbathe as a teenager and young adult in sweltering heat and not think anything of it. But when my mum’s wrinkles show, so does her life, her eighty-three years of work and pleasure and sorrow and joy. I can see my sister and myself reflected in her wrinkles and in her face, and when people see me, they immediately see my mother. I wouldn’t want it any other way. I blame it on a culture, which shuns maturity and applauds youth, so those of us who are maturing, perhaps feel that in order to keep up with the young (which by the way, we don’t have to do by having surgery), we must pay heaps to look like the young. It doesn’t work.

I do colour my hair, probably because of the ageist world we live in, and the ageism that exists in my profession, but that’s about all I do, and anyway, I don’t think it’s the same as surgery. To many, grey hair = old = out of date = out of touch = unfashionable = we don’t want you, you can’t do the job. There is nothing attractive about an older person trying to look ‘younger’ from the chin up, the women with wrinkled necks and foreheads that don’t move, the men with ill-fitting toupées, granted I don’t know much about the latter but I doubt it requires surgery (unless you go for hair implants I suppose). You don’t look like a young person, you look like an older person trying to look young, which is not the same thing at all. Wrinkles and liver spots on necks and hands give the game away, so get wise, live for the now, be proud of who you are and stop trying to fool yourself, because you don’t fool me. When I look at you I don’t see the person you are, but the person you are trying to recreate and it doesn’t work. I’d rather live in a world where people look individual, where people grow older as they used to, than live in a world of Stepford men and women. I’m not suggesting we all walk around looking our worst (I have enough times, often in Sainsburys, and always meeting someone I know), but save your thousands of pounds for a real problem, which I hope none of us ever have. Enjoy being the person you are, rather than loosing sight of that for a false sense of appearance. As my energetic dad says, you’re as young as you feel, and he mostly feels sixty-five! He goes to the gym every week, he is constantly rushing around and living his life, being the person he is rather than the person he tries to be. I hope I am as energetic when I am sixty. I know what I want to look like if I reach his age and I know who I want to look like, two people I can see myself in and not parents I don’t recognise anymore. And I plan on doing it naturally, without faking it with surgery and injections. And I will let my hair go grey. Right now I am deciding when might be the right time. Perhaps when I am sixty.

Okay with Gay. It’s not Fixed Yet

I woke up this morning planning the day ahead, hoping to finish a script, perhaps spend an hour in the gym (if I finish the script my treat is a brisk work-out, go figure), thinking about a friend who is unwell, and pondering, yet again, my own mortality, which creeps up on me every day. And then I read about Stuart Walker, a twenty eight year old man who police are saying may have been tied to a lamppost, beaten and burned to death, and possibly because he was gay. This crime happened in Scotland. I felt physically sick when I read this and then I felt immense anger. There is nothing that makes this atrocity acceptable, whatever the reason, it is not okay, it will never be okay. This is the kind of act I relate to the race attacks in the southern states of America, which still took place during my lifetime up to the 1960s, but not of Scotland or anywhere else and not in the twenty-first century. And I do not forget the brutal murder of Jody Dobrowski, or others killed in homophobic attacks, which are alarmingly on the rise. It was not okay then, it’s not okay now. If this grotesque act was carried out because Stuart Walker was gay, it worries me, and I’ve never been worried about being gay before, or perhaps not to the extent I am now, possibly because what was once uncommon is becoming too common. While we are aware that homosexuality is still illegal in some US states and countless countries, and homosexuals are frequently killed in the most inhumane ways in Iran, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Zimbabwe, I wonder if our real feelings, those of us in the apparently civilised west, are suppressed because what goes on in those countries is so other to us, we are able to detach ourselves from the awfulness, because it wouldn’t happen here, it couldn’t happen here. And now it has happened here, on great British soil, how do we feel about it? When comedians still make jokes at the expense of gay men, though mostly at the expense of lesbians (if I knew I was that funny I’d have made a career out of it), when the press and television and theatre allow audiences to applaud every time I am at the heart of another cruel joke, or the term gay is used in a derogatory way by school children and adults and few people speak out and correct them, I say I have had enough. Try substituting gay and lesbian for black, Indian, Pakistani, disabled, Jewish, Muslim, or any other minority you can think of and see what kind of response you get then. You wouldn’t dare. Well, I’ve had enough of it, enough of people not speaking out, not taking my side, (and those who do, don’t get the medals because I don’t get a medal every time I support a black, disabled or Muslim friend, because it is a given), because it is right and just that you take my side, that you support me and countless others, because if you don’t it makes me think you’re scared, that perhaps you know, in your heart that it isn’t fixed, but you can’t admit it, because if you admit it, you might have to do something about it, and it’s so much easier to say nothing than to speak out. It’s so much easier to remain silent. But speaking out allows real change to happen. So admit it. It isn’t fixed. We need to work harder, as individuals and as a society, we need to work alongside the charities and organisations and individuals, Stonewall and Diversity Role Models, teacher Elly Barnes and No to Hate Crime, we need to make it okay for our homosexual children to feel safe in the world and for their heterosexual friends to feel safe about speaking out, with no fear of harsh reprisals, but we also need to work harder with our enemies, and we need to fix it before someone else is tied to a lamppost, beaten and killed.

I’m one of the lucky ones. But in the big world, out there, it’s not fixed yet. Our heterosexual friends may think there is no problem, because they are okay with us, because they have always been okay with us, because they have gay friends in their lives, because their children grow up knowing us and know better than to call us names, but for every heterosexual person who is okay with gay, there are at least fifty others who would happily see me imprisoned, correctively raped and killed. And it’s not okay.

why I won’t be buried with the rest of my family

Most people who know me, also know that my sister died on February 3rd 2011. It’s been a traumatic time for me and my elderly parents, and my sister’s three young adult children. Coming to terms with the death of a family member has been devastating. There have been rows and disagreements, moments of being perfectly fine and then in floods of tears, deep tears, which at times feel as if they will never stop. Anyone who has experienced grief knows that it comes in like the tide and goes out like the tide, but sometimes it just stays along the shore and you’re never quite sure when it will abate. Alongside the grief there was all the financial stuff to take care of. My sister had left all her paperwork in order, I suppose that is one advantage of knowing you are sick, the other is that if you want to, you can have the conversations most people never have, deep, meaningful, fulfilling conversations. We had many.

I took it upon myself to do probate – for those of you who don’t know what this means, probate is the term commonly used when talking about applying for the right to deal with a deceased person’s affairs. That’s what it says on the direct gov website. I could have handed the lot over to a solicitor, paid heaps of money and possibly waited a year or more for my sister’s estate to be sorted out, for inheritance tax to be paid with interest (if you don’t pay in full, six months or so from the date of death, you are charged interest on the outstanding amount). It’s not heaps of money I’m talking about, don’t get me wrong, I prefer to give the children their inheritance rather than giving it to a solicitor. Being the most impatient woman on the planet, I didn’t want to wait for someone else to do it. I never want to wait, why wait when you can have complete control and do it all when you want to? So I took it into my own hands, with occasional help from my cousin, the other executor – who lives on the other side of London and to be fair, I had all the paperwork with me, so it seemed ‘easier’ to do the majority of it alone. I called upon him for advice, and to complete final copies of all the documents, once I had drafted them in my untidy handwriting, pages and pages of them. I did probate for my uncle last year, so I knew what was ahead of me, and was rather smug about it. That’ll teach me.

Five months later, probate is through – unheard of, I am told by solicitor friends. This means we can soon start to administer the estate. It’s been incredibly hard and stressful work, and it has been work. I’ve probably spent two weeks of every month filling out forms and writing letters. The phone calls alone have taken up hours and hours of my time. My own work was set aside, but I take full responsibility, as I chose to do it. I wanted to handle my sister’s affairs, to make sure everything was carried out with dignity, ease and speed. Every phone call I made to companies about the house and bills has seen me hold back tears. Name. Address. Date of Death. Birthday. Every time. I learned it so the words came forth like an automaton, programmed to perfection. I became practiced at it. And mostly, those people from those companies were fantastic. Occasionally they didn’t know what to say, we’re not very good at death in this country, even though it is the one guarantee we have, often people don’t know what to say. My advice – say something rather than nothing, because saying nothing hurts, it does not acknowledge that something this momentous and life changing has taken place. Mentioning my sister in the same sentence as death does not sit comfortably with me, nor does it ring true. It is still impossible to believe that she is no longer alive. I reach for the phone at least once a day, I must tell Leah, I tell myself, and in that second she is alive and very much still in her house, pottering around her kitchen or garden, making dinner for her kids, cleaning and tidying and watering her plants. And then, in the next second, she is not. And every time it comes as a shock, as if I have only just heard the news. Probate, for me at least, was one of the last contributions I could make for my sister.

What, you ask, has any of this to do with my not being buried with my family?

I had to arrange for my sister’s funeral, with my Dad’s help and my cousin’s assistance. As most of you know, Jews, like Muslims, are buried swiftly, often on the same day they die. My sister was born and died on a Thursday. The Town Hall where my sister’s death would be registered, closes early on every first Thursday of the month, which meant we had to be really quick, with paperwork from the hospital where she died handed over as fast as they could manage, so that we could register her death, hand the relevant-coloured paper over to the synagogue which would guarantee that my sister could be buried on Friday. The alternative was to wait, register her death on Friday morning, and have the funeral on Sunday. I couldn’t contemplate a funeral the day after she died, I needed time to register it in my head, let alone in a book in a town hall alongside so many others. I wanted to say something, I needed time to write my words, think about what I would say, I couldn’t whip up stock sentiments, I had one chance only and I wanted to get it right. My parents were utterly distraught, my sister’s children devastated, our family and friends utterly supportive and distressed. To my sister’s kids and me, burying Leah on Friday seemed wrong, it was too soon. We agreed that Sunday would be best – not least because we knew lots of people wanted to be there and giving some notice is better than none, and a Sunday is better than a Friday, taking work and child care and travel arrangements into account. Not everyone’s lives are geared towards the Jewish way of life – and death. It seems the early Thursday closure of the Town Hall had a positive outcome after all. There were one or two ultra-orthodox relatives calling and asking why the funeral couldn’t be on the Friday – to which we said Leah would want more people to be able to send her off, rather than adhering to the religious dictates of a religion Leah followed in her own way. Leah was traditional, but people mattered more than faith.

Along with papers for Leah’s funeral, were papers about the memorial stone. There’s a long list of dos and don’ts. My Indian-Jewish-Iraqi heritage means we belong to the Spanish and Portuguese Jews’ Congregation, founded in 1657. Our memorial stones are flat. In the cemetery where my sister is buried, the reform Jews with their tall stones look down on us, like north Londoners on Parliament Hill looking down on south London. When my uncle died last year, my parents took care of his funeral arrangements. This meant I saw little of his memorial stone documents. This time I studied everything very carefully, because I had, of course, been thinking about my own mortality, my own death and my own funeral. The day after my sister died, in their house packed with overwhelmed relatives, my Dad asked if I intended to have a Jewish burial. I said I hoped so, but how could I contemplate that right now, just after Leah had died? Because, my Dad said, with the full knowledge that my Buddhist and once-Catholic wife, would never be allowed to be buried in a Jewish cemetery – never mind that she wants to be cremated – because we can have a double plot. All it means is that they dig deeper. I laughed and then I cried. Too soon to grieve, I was in that strange hyper, nebulous state, I was in pro-active, loads-to-do mode. I spoke to my wife about it, upsetting as it was, I told my Dad okay. Our many nieces and nephews would slip some of Stella’s ashes in beside me, the rest would go in the Thames or the Pacific, one large stretch of water, that is what Stella wants. The list of what you can and cannot have inscribed on the memorial stone were mostly dos and don’ts that I was already familiar with. No flowers allowed at Jewish graves, that we already know, but having visited the cemetery several times, I’ve noticed bouquets in our part of the synagogue, left by several gravesides. I shall slip some in for Leah next time I go, birthday blooms that would make her smile.

There are rules for married women and rules for single women, according to another rule, sisters and brothers cannot be mentioned by name, only as sister and brother of the deceased. But my mum has her name on her brother’s stone, and fortunately this has not been questioned by the rabbi, so I will be there, named after the kids and my parents, I will be there for eternity. I was ready to row with the rabbi about this if he challenged me, luckily for him, he didn’t. We also wanted to include some words to a song which comes from an American TV show called ‘It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia.’ These are the words we wanted alongside more meaningful ones:

Day man
Fighter of the Night man
Champion of the sun
You’re a master of karate and friendship…for everyone

Dayman Song

Some of the meaning is relevant to my sister, not the karate! We found it funny. Leah found it hilarious, it always made her roll back and smile. Leah and her kids, mostly her eldest son, used to sing this song, she would do the Uhh ahhahh and make me laugh out loud. We sang it to her – among other songs and lullabies – during the night and morning when she eased her way into death, in a quiet and unremarkable way, quiet, as she was in life. We all agreed these words would add a smile to her otherwise solemn inscription. The rabbi wouldn’t allow it. It is highly unusual – his words not mine. If they allow this kind of thing for everyone, they’ll set a precedent. Good, I said, so set a precedent. They still wouldn’t allow it. We had a feeling they might say no, and while we were all angry, we have almost accepted it. Almost. A friend whose husband is a stonemason has offered to send him round, inscribe the words. I am tempted, but I wouldn’t do it. In this instance, I play the game, stick by the rules, I wouldn’t want to offend anyone.

The words are written, a date has been set. But the rule which shocked me the most is this. Unless someone is what is called halachically Jewish, their name cannot be included on the memorial stone.

That means when I die, my wife’s name cannot go on my memorial stone. I called the stonemason, asked them about this, explained that I am gay, that didn’t seem to bother them, and asked about my wife’s name going on the stone. Oh, they said, no one’s ever asked about that before. To be fair, the stonemasons have been incredible, patient and kind at a time when stress rules my life. They said they wouldn’t have a problem with it, but the synagogue would. Given that the synagogue wouldn’t allow the words to Dayman, they are hardly going to change an archaic law that says my wife, my non-Jewish wife, cannot and will not have her name on my memorial stone. I told my mum and dad to forget about a double plot, I was not going to be buried there. My dad was surprised, but he didn’t try and make me change my mind. They both understood and accepted the reason why. My eighty-three-year-old dad has come a long way, considering it took him nine years to accept my wife. I love my mum and dad. I immediately emailed a liberal synagogue in Streatham, where I have been on several occasions, for a wedding and a naming, and I vented my anger, shared what our rabbi had said. Would they allow my non-Jewish wife’s name to go on my memorial stone? Of course they would. And that is why I won’t be buried with the rest of my family, in the same part of the cemetery as the rest of my family. They’re all there, my sister, my uncle, cousins too, and by the time I am out of this world on my way to the next, I am sure there will be a few more, filling up the ground, surrounded by countryside and beautiful views with the odd secret bouquet laid to rest. I have spent my adult life working towards equality of all kinds, crossing the boundaries of race and religion and colour and sexuality. My wife works tirelessly with gay rights groups, puts herself out in the world, never denies who she is, and all for what? To be told she cannot have her name on her wife’s memorial stone. I have not worked hard to have my relationship accepted and acknowledged in life, only to have it rejected and ignored in death. I shall either be buried in a non-Jewish cemetery or in the reform part of the cemetery where my family are and will be. Mine will be an upright stone, a stone where my wife’s name will be included, bold and significant, just as she is in my life today. I still don’t know whether the gay thing is an issue – if she was gay and Jewish would they accept her name on my memorial stone? Maybe someone can find out and let me know – not that she is going to convert, not that I would ever ask her or expect it.

I like to believe change happens, and the orthodox Jewish religion needs to change if it is to see more people coming to the faith than turning away from it. It needs to include everyone and must rid itself of so many archaic laws. As my Dad said to me the other day, it’s not the religion, it’s the men who make the rules, the men who won’t change the rules. Don’t blame the religion, he said, blame the men. I love parts of my religion, and I truly loathe others. I live in hope, perhaps the laws will be updated, perhaps the rabbis will realise how wrong they have been, to deny what I consider a human right, in death as in life. Perhaps I will be laid to rest alongside my family. Or perhaps they won’t change the rules, and I will be on one side of the cemetery while my family is on another. I know one thing, my wife’s name will be there, on my memorial stone, with words that will sing out loud. Shelley Silas wife of Stella Duffy. Wife of Stella Duffy.

Me and No 10

A few weeks ago, my wife Stella was invited to an annual event for the LGBT community at No 10 Downing Street. The emphasis this year was on tackling homophobia and transphobia in sport. As someone who has quite a high public profile, and yet who has always been, and still is, very much old Labour, Stella was unsure about attending an event hosted by a Conservative government, not least because of the negative response by some people – how could a Labour supporter be part of a Tory event? Stella, while pondering whether or not she should go – asked if I wanted to join her. As with most things, I immediately said no, I couldn’t possibly join a Tory party, it would be wrong. As the days passed, Stella decided to go, one reason was because she had never been invited to a LGBT event by any Labour government. As someone who gives a great deal of her time to LGBT issues, I agreed that she should go. I raised the question on Face Book and Twitter, asking others what they thought I should do. Except for one person, everyone said GO. And so yesterday, with passports in hand and excitement rising, we arrived promptly at four o’clock along with everyone else, inching closer to No 10. We passed the security check (men with guns have always scared me) and walked across the street (which resembles a film set) and through those famous, highly polished doors. I then realised this was an event I had given very little thought to, giving more thought to what I would wear instead.

I was as unashamedly inquisitive as the next person. I wanted to have a good nose around the house, after all I’d seen it on television since I was a child. My parents have always been Tory supporters, but are wavering now. They are unhappy with David Cameron and his team, not that they would ever vote Labour. They told me to have a word with him and I explained it was unlikely we would meet. My parents like to call me a cappuccino drinking (extra sprinkles), Guardian reader, who, in their minds, is very radical. I am not. I like to think I am very tolerant and mostly, I am. Like Stella, I am old Labour, my values have changed as I have grown older, but I am all for looking out for my society, am happy to pay higher taxes so that the less well off can afford to survive, and do what I can do contribute. But what was I doing here, at No 10?

After we left our mobiles at reception (I loved the absence of mobiles for two whole hours), we made our way down the hallway and I noticed an L.S. Lowri painting. I had to look twice at the signature. I don’t know why I was so surprised and excited, perhaps because I am not used to seeing great works of art in people’s homes, but this didn’t feel like someone’s home, more a temporary accommodation-come-workplace, which is filled with people like me and Stella and dignitaries and celebrities all day every day. I thought about all those people traipsing through our house, and then reminded myself it was never going to happen. On we walked, fresh flowers accompanying us everywhere we went, up the famous staircase, with photographs of all the PMs, and I did tingle and it was special and I even managed a quick glance at Margaret Thatcher’s photo. Upstairs to three large reception rooms, I likened it to our small terrace being broken through from one end to the other, just bigger and deeper and higher, and full of priceless objects. I ignored the first room of people and walked instead through to the furthest room, where a couple of men were being nosy too! The first man I spoke to was the MD of the Huddersfield Giants (did you know that Huddersfield was the birthplace of rugby league?). We were both amazed at the view through the large windows, looking out onto Horse Guards Parade. I didn’t expect that view, not sure why, I know London’s layout pretty well, I just didn’t put the two locations together! So that’s how the Queen travels so quickly from Buck House to No 10.

The afternoon progressed, along with more famous paintings, a few famous faces, but actually not that many. I was more excited to see Ben Cohen than David Cameron, even more thrilled that I managed to introduce myself to Billie Jean King, someone I have respected since I was a teenager. She was a reminder to why we were all there – addressing the problem of homophobia in sport. Billie Jean King lost all her endorsements within 24 hours of being outed. And still there are so few sports people who have come out. I was told there are twenty premiership players who are gay. Imagine what a difference it would make if they came out, all of them. That is why I was at No 10. To try and make a difference, to try and make it okay for those who are not okay.

And now to the food – canapés and alcohol were plentiful, the sausages particularly delicious, as were the gigantic strawberries dipped in chocolate. Yes, I admit to enjoying the food. I met so many interesting people, some gay, some lesbian, some heterosexual, some transgender, some bisexual. Who cared? I didn’t. Because in those rooms, for me at least, something important happened. I thought about the protests by people who refused to attend the event, or thought that the likes of me shouldn’t attend, or that we were just playing up to the Tories, or that we were there to gape (what’s wrong with gaping?), and I questioned myself, and Stella and the rest of us. David Cameron spoke very briefly, and then seemed to disappear. A few of his colleagues (Theresa May, Margot James, Anne Milton) were on hand to talk to the more important guests, the ones who make a real difference, Lisa Power, Policy Director from the Terence Higgins Trust, Claire Harvey, a brilliant woman and paralympian. We are both patrons of Diversity Role Models, a new foundation set up by Suran Dickson. Ben Cohen, now retired, was there as Chairman of the Ben Cohen StandUp Foundation, the world’s first anti-bullying organisation. Gareth Thomas and plenty of other well-known, and many more not so well known people, in and out of the sports world, all came together because of a cause, not a Tory cause, but a world wide cause that was important to me. Homophobia and transphobia in sport. And yes, David Cameron is not my best friend and I still disagree with pretty much everything he stands for, but this is a cause that crosses parties, and I wanted to be party to this cause. And that is why I went and that is why I will never apologise for going because the cause is what mattered, irrespective of whether it was hosted by Labour, Tory or a government from outer space. The food didn’t matter, and the décor didn’t matter, and ultimately what I wore didn’t matter, what did matter was that I found myself speaking to so many different people, and not once did I question whether they were gay or lesbian, heterosexual, transgender or bisexual or Tory or Labour or Lib Dem. For two hours, the people in those spacious and bright reception rooms, through my eyes at least, provided a microcosm of the possibilities for the society we live in. We still have a long way to go with sexuality and racism and all the other isms you can add to the list, the event showed a glimmer of hope. And if I haven’t said it enough, the emphasis was on the cause, not which political party you align yourself with. It allowed me a chance to show my support to my colleagues who make the groundbreaking work happen, and to those I respect. If we don’t talk to each other, and break down barriers, what hope is there for a better world? If I remain in the room across the hall, do I have to wait for the person opposite to make the first move, or can I be braver than that? I like to think I am always braver. If only Israel and Hamas would speak, the world might change overnight. Yes, I’m an optimist, but it’s better than being a pessimist because I might as well give up. I honestly believe that it is far better to talk to your enemies, to stand beside them with your differences in one hand and your hope in the other, than rage at them from across the street and wait for a miracle to happen. We create the miracles. It is better to share the same space, note our differences face to face, rather than ghettoise ourselves and push ourselves so deeply into corners, that the only way out is if someone else prises us out, and that rarely happens. There are quite a few brave people in the world, but more who would like to be brave but never make that step, because they are afraid of losing jobs, being hated, being bullied.

I also realised this yesterday; that our wonderful and accepting heterosexual friends, who have no problems with our sexuality, might actually think it’s fixed, so they don’t speak out or consider that perhaps all is not so great. See above, Ben Cohen, ‘the first straight sports star to donate his philanthropic efforts for the benefit of LGBT people.’ We need heterosexual allies, and those we have are plentiful, but when one of their kids comes out and they realise it’s not fixed, I don’t want to be the one to say I told you so.

At the end of the afternoon, after signing a flip chart, (I’m still unsure what I signed), the man who I had first talked to, in the room with the view of Horse Guards Parade, gave me a rugby shirt. Here, he said, this is for you, because you were the first person I spoke to and you were so lovely. Before he went, he invited us both to a match when we’re in Huddersfield. I’m going to take him up on his offer. I left No 10, no better or worse as a person, but full of hope. Surely that’s what it was all about?